Athlon 64 X2 4600+ vs Core 2 Duo E6700
General info
Comparing Core 2 Duo E6700 and Athlon 64 X2 4600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2626 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 0.98 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Core 2 Duo (Desktop) | 2x Athlon 64 (Desktop) |
| Architecture codename | Conroe (2006−2007) | Windsor (2006−2009) |
| Release date | no data | no data |
| Current price | $18 | $50 |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
Technical specs
Core 2 Duo E6700 and Athlon 64 X2 4600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Bus support | 1066 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo E6700 and Athlon 64 X2 4600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core 2 Duo E6700 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4600+ by 38% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core 2 Duo E6700 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4600+ by 41% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core 2 Duo E6700 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4600+ by 33% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Core 2 Duo E6700 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4600+ by 40% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core 2 Duo E6700 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4600+ by 37% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E6700 and Athlon 64 X2 4600+. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6700 and Athlon 64 X2 4600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
