Celeron G3930 vs Core 2 Duo E6550
Aggregate performance score
Celeron G3930 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6550 by a whopping 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo E6550 and Celeron G3930 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 2713 | 2096 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.68 | 0.75 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
Architecture codename | Conroe (2006−2007) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
Release date | July 2007 (17 years ago) | 3 January 2017 (7 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $42 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Celeron G3930 has 10% better value for money than Core 2 Duo E6550.
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo E6550 and Celeron G3930 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
Bus support | no data | 8 GT/s |
L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 143 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 72 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 65 °C |
Number of transistors | 291 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo E6550 and Celeron G3930 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | 775 | 1151 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 51 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E6550 and Celeron G3930. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
TSX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E6550 and Celeron G3930 are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E6550 and Celeron G3930. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics 610 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo E6550 and Celeron G3930.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Celeron G3930 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6550 by 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Celeron G3930 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6550 by 151% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Celeron G3930 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6550 by 133% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Celeron G3930 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6550 by 141% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.58 | 1.45 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 51 Watt |
Celeron G3930 has a 150% higher aggregate performance score, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 27.5% lower power consumption.
The Celeron G3930 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E6550 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6550 and Celeron G3930, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.