Celeron 817 vs Core 2 Duo E6550
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3047 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 0.34 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Conroe (2006−2007) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | July 2007 (18 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo E6550 and Celeron 817 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.33 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 16 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 million | 504 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.5V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo E6550 and Celeron 817 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | PLGA775 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E6550 and Celeron 817. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| FMA | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo E6550 and Celeron 817 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E6550 and Celeron 817 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E6550 and Celeron 817. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
Celeron 817 has a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 282.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 and Intel Celeron 817. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Duo E6550 is a desktop processor while Celeron 817 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
