Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Core 2 Duo E6550

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core 2 Duo E6550
2007
2 cores / 2 threads
0.57
Athlon 64 FX-74
2006
2 cores / 2 threads
0.63
+10.5%

Athlon 64 FX-74 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6550 by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core 2 Duo E6550 and Athlon 64 FX-74 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26722632
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.680.13
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Windsor (2006−2009)
Release dateJuly 2007 (16 years old)November 2006 (17 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$500
Current price$41 $500 (1x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Core 2 Duo E6550 has 423% better value for money than Athlon 64 FX-74.

Technical specs

Core 2 Duo E6550 and Athlon 64 FX-74 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.33 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.33 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache4 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die size143 mm2235 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E6550 and Athlon 64 FX-74 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPLGA775F
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E6550 and Athlon 64 FX-74. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E6550 and Athlon 64 FX-74 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E6550 and Athlon 64 FX-74 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E6550 and Athlon 64 FX-74. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E6550 0.57
Athlon 64 FX-74 0.63
+10.5%

Athlon 64 FX-74 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6550 by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo E6550 885
Athlon 64 FX-74 972
+9.8%

Athlon 64 FX-74 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6550 by 10% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.57 0.63
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

The Athlon 64 FX-74 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E6550 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6550 and Athlon 64 FX-74, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Core 2 Duo E6550
AMD Athlon 64 FX-74
Athlon 64 FX-74

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 330 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Athlon 64 FX-74 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6550 or Athlon 64 FX-74, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.