A8-7680 vs Core 2 Duo E6550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E6550
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.57
A8-7680
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
2.24
+293%

A8-7680 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6550 by a whopping 293% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E6550 and A8-7680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28351834
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.78
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD A8
Power efficiency0.834.71
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Excavator (2017−2018)
Release dateJuly 2007 (17 years ago)26 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$56

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E6550 and A8-7680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.33 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.33 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
Multiplierno data38
L1 cache64 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
Die size143 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors291 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E6550 and A8-7680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPLGA775FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E6550 and A8-7680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E6550 and A8-7680 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E6550 and A8-7680 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E6550 and A8-7680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon R7 Series

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E6550 0.57
A8-7680 2.24
+293%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E6550 898
A8-7680 3551
+295%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 2.24
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

A8-7680 has a 293% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

The A8-7680 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E6550 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6550 and A8-7680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Core 2 Duo E6550
AMD A8-7680
A8-7680

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 367 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 517 votes

Rate A8-7680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6550 or A8-7680, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.