Ryzen 3 4300U vs Core 2 Duo E6400

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E6400 and Ryzen 3 4300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1168
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Renoir-U (Zen 2)
Release dateJuly 2006 (17 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$46 $520

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E6400 and Ryzen 3 4300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.13 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm
Die size143 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C105 °C
Number of transistors291 million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E6400 and Ryzen 3 4300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775,PLGA775FP6
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E6400 and Ryzen 3 4300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E6400 and Ryzen 3 4300U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E6400 and Ryzen 3 4300U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E6400 and Ryzen 3 4300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo E6400 and Ryzen 3 4300U.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo E6400 765
Ryzen 3 4300U 7448
+874%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms Core 2 Duo E6400 by 874% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo E6400 237
Ryzen 3 4300U 1246
+426%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms Core 2 Duo E6400 by 426% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo E6400 398
Ryzen 3 4300U 3360
+744%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms Core 2 Duo E6400 by 744% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E6400 and Ryzen 3 4300U. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Duo E6400 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 4300U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6400 and Ryzen 3 4300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6400
Core 2 Duo E6400
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
Ryzen 3 4300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 128 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 904 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 4300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6400 or Ryzen 3 4300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.