Celeron D 346 vs Core 2 Duo E6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E6300 and Celeron D 346 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3004not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.58no data
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release dateJuly 2006 (18 years ago)October 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E6300 and Celeron D 346 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.86 GHz3.06 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz3.06 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB16 KB
L2 cache2 MB256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die size143 mm2109 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C68 °C
Number of transistors291 million125 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5V1.25V-1.4V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E6300 and Celeron D 346 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775,PLGA775PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt84 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E6300 and Celeron D 346. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E6300 and Celeron D 346 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E6300 and Celeron D 346 are enumerated here.

VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E6300 and Celeron D 346. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 84 Watt

Core 2 Duo E6300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 29.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E6300 and Celeron D 346. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6300 and Celeron D 346, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
Core 2 Duo E6300
Intel Celeron D 346
Celeron D 346

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 219 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 61 vote

Rate Celeron D 346 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6300 or Celeron D 346, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.