Turion X2 RM-75 vs Core 2 Duo E4700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E4700
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.57
+35.7%
Turion X2 RM-75
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42

Core 2 Duo E4700 outperforms Turion X2 RM-75 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E4700 and Turion X2 RM-75 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28252981
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno data2x AMD Turion
Power efficiency0.831.13
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Lion (2008−2009)
Release dateMarch 2008 (16 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E4700 and Turion X2 RM-75 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz4000 MHz
L1 cache64 KB256 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size111 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors167 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E4700 and Turion X2 RM-75 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPLGA775S1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E4700 and Turion X2 RM-75. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E4700 and Turion X2 RM-75 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E4700 and Turion X2 RM-75 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E4700 and Turion X2 RM-75. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E4700 0.57
+35.7%
Turion X2 RM-75 0.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E4700 908
+35.5%
Turion X2 RM-75 670

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 0.42
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Duo E4700 has a 35.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Turion X2 RM-75, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo E4700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 RM-75 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Duo E4700 is a desktop processor while Turion X2 RM-75 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E4700 and Turion X2 RM-75, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E4700
Core 2 Duo E4700
Turion X2 RM-75
Turion X2 RM-75

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 96 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Turion X2 RM-75 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E4700 or Turion X2 RM-75, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.