Ryzen Threadripper 1950 vs Core 2 Duo E4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E4600
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.51
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 180 Watt
14.27
+2698%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 outperforms Core 2 Duo E4600 by a whopping 2698% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E4600 and Ryzen Threadripper 1950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2771477
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.22
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Zen (2017−2020)
Release dateOctober 2007 (16 years ago)29 July 2017 (6 years ago)
Current price$63 $493

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E4600 and Ryzen Threadripper 1950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size111 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors167 million9,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E4600 and Ryzen Threadripper 1950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E4600 and Ryzen Threadripper 1950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E4600 and Ryzen Threadripper 1950 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E4600 and Ryzen Threadripper 1950 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E4600 and Ryzen Threadripper 1950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4 Quad-channel

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E4600 0.51
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 14.27
+2698%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 outperforms Core 2 Duo E4600 by 2698% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo E4600 785
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 22077
+2712%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 outperforms Core 2 Duo E4600 by 2712% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.51 14.27
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 180 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E4600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E4600 and Ryzen Threadripper 1950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E4600
Core 2 Duo E4600
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 193 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 20 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E4600 or Ryzen Threadripper 1950, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.