Xeon 6979P vs Celeron U3600

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron U3600 and Xeon 6979P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Granite Rapids (2024)
Release date11 January 2011 (13 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron U3600 and Xeon 6979P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)120
Threads2240
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier9no data
L1 cache128 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB504 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors382 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron U3600 and Xeon 6979P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketBGA12887529
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron U3600 and Xeon 6979P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron U3600 and Xeon 6979P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron U3600 and Xeon 6979P are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron U3600 and Xeon 6979P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron U3600 and Xeon 6979P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron U3600 and Xeon 6979P.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1696

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2011 24 September 2024
Physical cores 2 120
Threads 2 240
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 500 Watt

Celeron U3600 has 2677.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6979P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 5900% more physical cores and 11900% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron U3600 and Xeon 6979P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron U3600 is a notebook processor while Xeon 6979P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron U3600 and Xeon 6979P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron U3600
Celeron U3600
Intel Xeon 6979P
Xeon 6979P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Celeron U3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon 6979P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron U3600 or Xeon 6979P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.