Ryzen 5 8400F vs Celeron U3600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron U3600 and Ryzen 5 8400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated402
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data72.73
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Phoenix
Release date11 January 2011 (13 years ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Current priceno data$169

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron U3600 and Ryzen 5 8400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus support1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size81 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 Million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron U3600 and Ryzen 5 8400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketBGA1288AM5
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron U3600 and Ryzen 5 8400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA+no data
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron U3600 and Ryzen 5 8400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron U3600 and Ryzen 5 8400F are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron U3600 and Ryzen 5 8400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron U3600 and Ryzen 5 8400F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron U3600 and Ryzen 5 8400F.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron U3600 579
Ryzen 5 8400F 24584
+4146%

Ryzen 5 8400F outperforms Celeron U3600 by 4146% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2011 1 April 2024
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron U3600 and Ryzen 5 8400F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron U3600 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 8400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron U3600 and Ryzen 5 8400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron U3600
Celeron U3600
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
Ryzen 5 8400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Celeron U3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 39 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron U3600 or Ryzen 5 8400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.