Core 2 Extreme QX9775 vs Celeron U3600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3360not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.85no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date11 January 2011 (14 years ago)24 March 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,499

Detailed specifications

Celeron U3600 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s1600 MHz
Multiplier9no data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB6 MB (per die)
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size81 mm22x 107 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data63 °C
Number of transistors382 Million820 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron U3600 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketBGA1288LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron U3600 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Celeron U3600 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron U3600 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron U3600 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR2
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsN/A
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron U3600 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron U3600 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775.

PCIe version2.01.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2011 24 March 2008
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 150 Watt

Celeron U3600 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

Core 2 Extreme QX9775, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron U3600 and Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron U3600 is a notebook processor while Core 2 Extreme QX9775 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron U3600
Celeron U3600
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775
Core 2 Extreme QX9775

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Celeron U3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 57 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9775 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron U3600 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.