Celeron G6900E vs U3600
Primary details
Comparing Celeron U3600 and Celeron G6900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3049 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
Power efficiency | 1.89 | no data |
Architecture codename | Westmere (2010−2011) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
Release date | 11 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron U3600 and Celeron G6900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 0.1 GHz | 3 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 1.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 1 × 2.5 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 9 | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 81 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 382 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron U3600 and Celeron G6900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | BGA1288 | 1700 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 46 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron U3600 and Celeron G6900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron U3600 and Celeron G6900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | + |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron U3600 and Celeron G6900E are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | + |
VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron U3600 and Celeron G6900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-800 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 12.799 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 500 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron U3600 and Celeron G6900E integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron U3600 and Celeron G6900E.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 0.77 | 2.86 |
Recency | 11 January 2011 | 4 January 2022 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 46 Watt |
Celeron U3600 has 155.6% lower power consumption.
Celeron G6900E, on the other hand, has 271.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron U3600 and Celeron G6900E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron U3600 is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900E is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron U3600 and Celeron G6900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.