EPYC 9175F vs Celeron U3405

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron U3405 and EPYC 9175F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2971not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency2.26no data
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Turin (2024)
Release dateno data10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,256

Detailed specifications

Celeron U3405 and EPYC 9175F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed1.06 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier8no data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB512 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size81 mm216x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 Million133,040 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron U3405 and EPYC 9175F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketBGA1288SP5
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron U3405 and EPYC 9175F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron U3405 and EPYC 9175F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron U3405 and EPYC 9175F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron U3405 and EPYC 9175F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsN/A
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron U3405 and EPYC 9175F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron U3405 and EPYC 9175F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 320 Watt

Celeron U3405 has 1677.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9175F, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron U3405 and EPYC 9175F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron U3405 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9175F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron U3405 and EPYC 9175F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron U3405
Celeron U3405
AMD EPYC 9175F
EPYC 9175F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Celeron U3405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9175F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron U3405 or EPYC 9175F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.