A4-3330MX vs Celeron U3405

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron U3405
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.43
A4-3330MX
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 45 Watt
0.48
+11.6%

A4-3330MX outperforms Celeron U3405 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron U3405 and A4-3330MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29712918
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD A-Series
Power efficiency2.261.01
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Llano (2011−2012)
Release dateno data20 December 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron U3405 and A4-3330MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.06 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier8no data
L1 cache128 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron U3405 and A4-3330MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288FS1
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron U3405 and A4-3330MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron U3405 and A4-3330MX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron U3405 and A4-3330MX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron U3405 and A4-3330MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsAMD Radeon HD 6480G (444 MHz)
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron U3405 and A4-3330MX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron U3405 and A4-3330MX.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron U3405 0.43
A4-3330MX 0.48
+11.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron U3405 684
A4-3330MX 756
+10.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.43 0.48
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.66
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron U3405 has 16.7% faster integrated GPU, and 150% lower power consumption.

A4-3330MX, on the other hand, has a 11.6% higher aggregate performance score.

The A4-3330MX is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron U3405 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron U3405 and A4-3330MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron U3405
Celeron U3405
AMD A4-3330MX
A4-3330MX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Celeron U3405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5 votes

Rate A4-3330MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron U3405 or A4-3330MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.