Ryzen 5 7520C vs Celeron U3400
Primary details
Comparing Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 7520C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3092 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
Power efficiency | 1.68 | no data |
Architecture codename | Westmere (2010−2011) | Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) |
Release date | 24 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 7520C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 1.06 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 0.07 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 1.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 1 × 2.5 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 8 | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 6 nm |
Die size | 81 mm2 | 100 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 382 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 7520C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | BGA1288 | FT6 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 7520C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 7520C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 7520C are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 7520C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-800 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 12.799 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors | AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz) |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 500 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 7520C integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 7520C.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 0.77 | 2.85 |
Recency | 24 May 2010 | 23 May 2023 |
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Threads | 2 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 5 7520C has 270.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 433.3% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 7520C. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 7520C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.