i9-13900KS vs Celeron U3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron U3400
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.29
Core i9-13900KS
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
34.47
+11786%

Core i9-13900KS outperforms Celeron U3400 by a whopping 11786% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3336117
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.43
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency0.689.71
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date24 May 2010 (15 years ago)12 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron U3400 and Core i9-13900KS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data16
Threads232
Base clock speed1.06 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz5.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier8no data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size81 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors382 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron U3400 and Core i9-13900KS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron U3400 and Core i9-13900KS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron U3400 and Core i9-13900KS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron U3400 and Core i9-13900KS are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron U3400 and Core i9-13900KS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency500 MHz1.65 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron U3400 and Core i9-13900KS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported24

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron U3400 and Core i9-13900KS integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron U3400 and Core i9-13900KS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron U3400 and Core i9-13900KS.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron U3400 0.29
i9-13900KS 34.47
+11786%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron U3400 516
Samples: 15
i9-13900KS 60584
+11641%
Samples: 1381

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron U3400 176
i9-13900KS 3123
+1674%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron U3400 313
i9-13900KS 21382
+6731%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.29 34.47
Integrated graphics card 0.68 5.37
Recency 24 May 2010 12 January 2023
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 32
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 150 Watt

Celeron U3400 has 733.3% lower power consumption.

i9-13900KS, on the other hand, has a 11786.2% higher aggregate performance score, 689.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 12 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

The Intel Core i9-13900KS is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron U3400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron U3400 is a notebook processor while Core i9-13900KS is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron U3400
Celeron U3400
Intel Core i9-13900KS
Core i9-13900KS

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 30 votes

Rate Celeron U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 866 votes

Rate Core i9-13900KS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron U3400 and Core i9-13900KS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.