i3-N305 vs Celeron U3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron U3400 and Core i3-N305 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1034
Place by popularitynot in top-10043
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date24 May 2010 (14 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron U3400 and Core i3-N305 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.06 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier8no data
L1 cache128 KB768 KB
L2 cache512 KB4 MB
L3 cache2 MB6 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors382 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron U3400 and Core i3-N305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron U3400 and Core i3-N305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
FMA++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
GPIOno data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Celeron U3400 and Core i3-N305 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron U3400 and Core i3-N305 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron U3400 and Core i3-N305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHz1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron U3400 and Core i3-N305 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron U3400 and Core i3-N305 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron U3400 and Core i3-N305 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron U3400 and Core i3-N305.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes169
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron U3400 516
i3-N305 9997
+1837%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2010 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 15 Watt

i3-N305 has an age advantage of 12 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 20% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron U3400 and Core i3-N305. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron U3400 and Core i3-N305, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron U3400
Celeron U3400
Intel Core i3-N305
Core i3-N305

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 30 votes

Rate Celeron U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 565 votes

Rate Core i3-N305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron U3400 or Core i3-N305, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.