Xeon W-3275 vs Celeron T3500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron T3500
2010
35 Watt
0.43
Xeon W-3275
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
23.48
+5360%

Xeon W-3275 outperforms Celeron T3500 by a whopping 5360% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3159263
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.97
Market segmentLaptopServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency0.524.84
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameno dataCascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date1 July 2010 (15 years ago)3 June 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron T3500 and Xeon W-3275 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threadsno data56
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data25
L1 cacheno data1.75 MB
L2 cacheno data28 MB
L3 cache1 MB38.5 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data76 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T3500 and Xeon W-3275 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPGA478FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T3500 and Xeon W-3275. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron T3500 and Xeon W-3275 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T3500 and Xeon W-3275 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron T3500 and Xeon W-3275. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron T3500 and Xeon W-3275.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron T3500 0.43
Xeon W-3275 23.48
+5360%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron T3500 764
Samples: 241
Xeon W-3275 41267
+5301%
Samples: 9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.43 23.48
Recency 1 July 2010 3 June 2019
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 205 Watt

Celeron T3500 has 485.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3275, on the other hand, has a 5360.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon W-3275 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron T3500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron T3500 is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3275 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron T3500
Celeron T3500
Intel Xeon W-3275
Xeon W-3275

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 8 votes

Rate Celeron T3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron T3500 and Xeon W-3275, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.