Ryzen Z1 vs Celeron T3100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron T3100
2008
35 Watt
0.38
Ryzen Z1
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
11.94
+3042%

Ryzen Z1 outperforms Celeron T3100 by a whopping 3042% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron T3100 and Ryzen Z1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3031651
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataPhoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency1.0375.28
Architecture codenameno dataPhoenix (Zen4) (2023)
Release date1 July 2008 (16 years ago)May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron T3100 and Ryzen Z1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data6 (Hexa-Core)
Threadsno data12
Base clock speed1.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data137 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T3100 and Ryzen Z1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA479,PGA478FP8
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T3100 and Ryzen Z1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron T3100 and Ryzen Z1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T3100 and Ryzen Z1 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron T3100 and Ryzen Z1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron T3100 and Ryzen Z1.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron T3100 0.38
Ryzen Z1 11.94
+3042%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron T3100 599
Ryzen Z1 18962
+3066%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron T3100 214
Ryzen Z1 2252
+952%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron T3100 365
Ryzen Z1 8321
+2180%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 11.94
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen Z1 has a 3042.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Z1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron T3100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T3100 and Ryzen Z1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron T3100
Celeron T3100
AMD Ryzen Z1
Ryzen Z1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 18 votes

Rate Celeron T3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 52 votes

Rate Ryzen Z1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron T3100 or Ryzen Z1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.