Processor N100 vs Celeron T1600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron T1600
2008
35 Watt
0.35
Processor N100
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
2.43
+594%

Processor N100 outperforms Celeron T1600 by a whopping 594% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron T1600 and Processor N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30661776
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency0.9538.30
Architecture codenameno dataAlder Lake-N (2023)
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$128

Detailed specifications

Celeron T1600 and Processor N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data4 (Quad-Core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed1.66 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.075V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T1600 and Processor N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T1600 and Processor N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Celeron T1600 and Processor N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T1600 and Processor N100 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron T1600 and Processor N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron T1600 and Processor N100.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 2.43
Recency 1 October 2008 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

Processor N100 has a 594.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The Processor N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron T1600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T1600 and Processor N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron T1600
Celeron T1600
Intel Processor N100
Processor N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8 votes

Rate Celeron T1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1326 votes

Rate Processor N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron T1600 or Processor N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.