Ryzen 5 7640U vs Celeron SU2300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 7640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated544
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiencyno data84.21
Architecture codenameno dataPhoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)3 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 7640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data6 (Hexa-Core)
Threadsno data12
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 7640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956FP8
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 7640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
StatusDiscontinuedno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 7640U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 7640U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 7640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 7640U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron SU2300 482
Ryzen 5 7640U 21193
+4297%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron SU2300 160
Ryzen 5 7640U 2159
+1249%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron SU2300 278
Ryzen 5 7640U 8835
+3078%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2009 3 May 2023
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron SU2300 has 50% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 7640U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 7640U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 7640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron SU2300
Celeron SU2300
AMD Ryzen 5 7640U
Ryzen 5 7640U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 3 votes

Rate Celeron SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 36 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7640U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron SU2300 or Ryzen 5 7640U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.