EPYC Embedded 3255 vs Celeron P4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3177not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD EPYC Embedded
Power efficiency0.61no data
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date28 March 2010 (16 years ago)21 February 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Celeron P4600 and EPYC Embedded 3255: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1525
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size81 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron P4600 and EPYC Embedded 3255 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPGA988AMD BGA SP4r2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron P4600 and EPYC Embedded 3255. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron P4600 and EPYC Embedded 3255 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron P4600 and EPYC Embedded 3255 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron P4600 and EPYC Embedded 3255. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size8 GB512 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron P4600 and EPYC Embedded 3255 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron P4600 and EPYC Embedded 3255.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1632

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 March 2010 21 February 2018
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 55 Watt

Celeron P4600 has 57% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 3255, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 129% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron P4600 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3255. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron P4600 is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 3255 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 32 votes

Rate Celeron P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 3255 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron P4600 and EPYC Embedded 3255, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.