EPYC 7713 vs Celeron P4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron P4600
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.54
EPYC 7713
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
53.45
+9798%

EPYC 7713 outperforms Celeron P4600 by a whopping 9798% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron P4600 and EPYC 7713 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking274725
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data14.70
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Milan (2021)
Release date28 March 2010 (14 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,060
Current price$66 $3290 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron P4600 and EPYC 7713 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz3.68 GHz
Bus support1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm+
Die size81 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 Million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron P4600 and EPYC 7713 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketPGA988SP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron P4600 and EPYC 7713. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA+no data
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron P4600 and EPYC 7713 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron P4600 and EPYC 7713 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron P4600 and EPYC 7713. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.1 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron P4600 and EPYC 7713 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron P4600 and EPYC 7713.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron P4600 0.54
EPYC 7713 53.45
+9798%

EPYC 7713 outperforms Celeron P4600 by 9798% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron P4600 832
EPYC 7713 82666
+9836%

EPYC 7713 outperforms Celeron P4600 by 9836% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron P4600 291
EPYC 7713 1570
+440%

EPYC 7713 outperforms Celeron P4600 by 440% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron P4600 533
EPYC 7713 14990
+2712%

EPYC 7713 outperforms Celeron P4600 by 2712% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 53.45
Recency 28 March 2010 15 March 2021
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 225 Watt

The EPYC 7713 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron P4600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron P4600 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7713 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron P4600 and EPYC 7713, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron P4600
Celeron P4600
AMD EPYC 7713
EPYC 7713

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 11 votes

Rate Celeron P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 106 votes

Rate EPYC 7713 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron P4600 or EPYC 7713, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.