Celeron N3000 vs P4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron P4600
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.53
+35.9%
Celeron N3000
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.39

Celeron P4600 outperforms Celeron N3000 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron P4600 and Celeron N3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28643015
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.439.23
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Braswell (2015−2016)
Release date28 March 2010 (14 years ago)1 April 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Celeron P4600 and Celeron N3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHz1.04 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz2.08 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0IDI
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Number of transistors382 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron P4600 and Celeron N3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPGA988FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron P4600 and Celeron N3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Responseno data-
PAE36 Bitno data
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Celeron P4600 and Celeron N3000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron P4600 and Celeron N3000 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron P4600 and Celeron N3000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video++
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency667 MHz600 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron P4600 and Celeron N3000 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron P4600 and Celeron N3000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron P4600 and Celeron N3000.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes164
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron P4600 0.53
+35.9%
Celeron N3000 0.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron P4600 846
+35.1%
Celeron N3000 626

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron P4600 291
+92.7%
Celeron N3000 151

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron P4600 533
+102%
Celeron N3000 264

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 0.39
Recency 28 March 2010 1 April 2015
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 4 Watt

Celeron P4600 has a 35.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron N3000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 775% lower power consumption.

The Celeron P4600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron P4600 and Celeron N3000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron P4600
Celeron P4600
Intel Celeron N3000
Celeron N3000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 11 votes

Rate Celeron P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 22 votes

Rate Celeron N3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron P4600 or Celeron N3000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.