Xeon Phi 7110X vs Celeron N6211
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N6211 and Xeon Phi 7110X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2199 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.33 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Elkhart Lake | no data |
| Power efficiency | 20.53 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Elkhart Lake (2022) | Knights Corner (2012−2014) |
| Release date | 17 July 2022 (2 years ago) | 12 November 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $54 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron N6211 and Xeon Phi 7110X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 61 (Henihexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 244 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.25 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 32 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | no data | 350 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 5,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N6211 and Xeon Phi 7110X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1493 | PCIe x16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6.5 Watt | 300 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Xeon Phi 7110X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Security technologies
Celeron N6211 and Xeon Phi 7110X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and Xeon Phi 7110X are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Xeon Phi 7110X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3, DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 July 2022 | 12 November 2012 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 61 |
| Threads | 2 | 244 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 300 Watt |
Celeron N6211 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 4900% lower power consumption.
Xeon Phi 7110X, on the other hand, has 2950% more physical cores and 12100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N6211 and Xeon Phi 7110X. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Xeon Phi 7110X is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Xeon Phi 7110X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
