Xeon 6315P vs Celeron N6211
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N6211 and Xeon 6315P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2279 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.33 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Elkhart Lake | no data |
| Power efficiency | 20.51 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Elkhart Lake (2022) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 17 July 2022 (2 years ago) | 24 February 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $54 | $213 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron N6211 and Xeon 6315P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | no data | 163 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N6211 and Xeon 6315P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1493 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6.5 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Xeon 6315P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Security technologies
Celeron N6211 and Xeon 6315P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and Xeon 6315P are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Xeon 6315P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N6211 and Xeon 6315P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 July 2022 | 24 February 2025 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 55 Watt |
Celeron N6211 has 816.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6315P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron N6211 and Intel Xeon 6315P. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Xeon 6315P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
