Turion X2 RM-77 vs Celeron N6211
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N6211 and Turion X2 RM-77 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2193 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.33 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Elkhart Lake | 2x AMD Turion |
| Power efficiency | 20.62 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Elkhart Lake (2022) | Griffin (2008−2009) |
| Release date | 17 July 2022 (2 years ago) | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $54 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron N6211 and Turion X2 RM-77 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 4000 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 0 MB |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N6211 and Turion X2 RM-77 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1493 | Socket S1 (638) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6.5 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Turion X2 RM-77. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and Turion X2 RM-77 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Turion X2 RM-77. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 July 2022 | 1 January 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 35 Watt |
Celeron N6211 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N6211 and Turion X2 RM-77. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Turion X2 RM-77 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Turion X2 RM-77, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
