Turion 64 X2 TL-53 vs Celeron N6211

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N6211 and Turion 64 X2 TL-53 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2193not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesElkhart Lake2x AMD Turion 64
Power efficiency20.62no data
Architecture codenameElkhart Lake (2022)Tyler (2007−2009)
Release date17 July 2022 (2 years ago)13 April 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and Turion 64 X2 TL-53 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache1.5 MB1 MB
Chip lithography10 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and Turion 64 X2 TL-53 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA1493no data
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Turion 64 X2 TL-53. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, Extended 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, PowerNow!, NX-Bit
AES-NI+-
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Turion 64 X2 TL-53. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 July 2022 13 April 2007
Chip lithography 10 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 31 Watt

Celeron N6211 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 416.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N6211 and Turion 64 X2 TL-53. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Turion 64 X2 TL-53 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Turion 64 X2 TL-53, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-53
Turion 64 X2 TL-53

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-53 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N6211 or Turion 64 X2 TL-53, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.