Itanium 9310 vs Celeron N6211
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2532 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.33 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Elkhart Lake | no data |
| Power efficiency | 8.31 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Elkhart Lake (2022) | no data |
| Release date | 17 July 2022 (3 years ago) | 1 January 2010 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $54 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron N6211 and Itanium 9310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | no data |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 10 MB L3 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N6211 and Itanium 9310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA1493 | FCLGA1248 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6.5 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Itanium 9310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| PAE | no data | 50 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron N6211 and Itanium 9310 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and Itanium 9310 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Itanium 9310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 July 2022 | 1 January 2010 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 130 Watt |
Celeron N6211 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 2067% lower power consumption.
Itanium 9310, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron N6211 and Intel Itanium 9310. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Itanium 9310 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
