Celeron N6211 vs EPYC 7H12

General info

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	39	2054
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	5.02	3.73
Market segment	Server	Desktop processor
Series	AMD EPYC	Elkhart Lake
Architecture codename	Zen 2 (2019−2020)	Elkhart Lake
Release date	18 September 2019 (4 years old)	17 July 2022 (1 year old)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$54
Current price	$6796	$240 (4.4x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7H12 has 35% better value for money than Celeron N6211.

Technical specs

EPYC 7H12 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	128	2
Base clock speed	2.6 GHz	1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.3 GHz	3 GHz
L1 cache	96K (per core)	no data
L2 cache	512K (per core)	1.5 MB
L3 cache	256 MB (shared)	no data
Chip lithography	7 nm, 14 nm	10 nm
Die size	192 mm2	no data
Number of transistors	4,800 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	+
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7H12 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2 (Multiprocessor)	no data
Socket	TR4	BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4 Eight-channel	DDR4, DDR4
Maximum memory size	4 TiB	no data
Max memory channels	8	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	204.763 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Celeron N6211 by 3006% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Performance score	45.03	1.45
Recency	18 September 2019	17 July 2022
Physical cores	64	2
Threads	128	2
Chip lithography	7 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	6 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---