EPYC 4464P vs Celeron N6211

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.41
EPYC 4464P
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
30.54
+2066%

EPYC 4464P outperforms Celeron N6211 by a whopping 2066% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N6211 and EPYC 4464P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2212135
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.3369.97
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesElkhart Lakeno data
Power efficiency20.5227.51
Architecture codenameElkhart Lake (2022)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date17 July 2022 (2 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4464P has 2001% better value for money than Celeron N6211.

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and EPYC 4464P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistorsno data13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and EPYC 4464P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA1493AM5
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and EPYC 4464P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and EPYC 4464P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and EPYC 4464P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N6211 and EPYC 4464P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data28

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N6211 1.41
EPYC 4464P 30.54
+2066%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N6211 2245
EPYC 4464P 48518
+2061%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 30.54
Integrated graphics card 1.39 1.98
Recency 17 July 2022 21 May 2024
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 105 Watt

Celeron N6211 has 1650% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4464P, on the other hand, has a 2066% higher aggregate performance score, 42.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4464P is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while EPYC 4464P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and EPYC 4464P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211
AMD EPYC 4464P
EPYC 4464P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 8 votes

Rate EPYC 4464P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N6211 or EPYC 4464P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.