i3-560 vs Celeron N6211

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.40
+37.3%
Core i3-560
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 73 Watt
1.02

Celeron N6211 outperforms Core i3-560 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N6211 and Core i3-560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22212463
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.330.06
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesElkhart Lakeno data
Power efficiency20.531.33
Architecture codenameElkhart Lake (2022)Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Release date17 July 2022 (2 years ago)29 August 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54$190

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron N6211 has 5450% better value for money than i3-560.

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and Core i3-560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.33 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz0.33 GHz
Bus rateno data2.5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °C73 °C
Number of transistorsno data382 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and Core i3-560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA1493FCLGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Core i3-560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Celeron N6211 and Core i3-560 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and Core i3-560 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Core i3-560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16.38 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Clear Video HDno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N6211 and Core i3-560 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N6211 and Core i3-560.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N6211 1.40
+37.3%
i3-560 1.02

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N6211 2245
+38%
i3-560 1627

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.40 1.02
Integrated graphics card 1.40 0.77
Recency 17 July 2022 29 August 2010
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 10 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 73 Watt

Celeron N6211 has a 37.3% higher aggregate performance score, 81.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 1116.7% lower power consumption.

i3-560, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

The Celeron N6211 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-560 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Core i3-560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211
Intel Core i3-560
Core i3-560

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 83 votes

Rate Core i3-560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N6211 or Core i3-560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.