Celeron 6205 vs N6211

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N6211 and Celeron 6205 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2193not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesElkhart LakeIntel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency20.62no data
Architecture codenameElkhart Lake (2022)Tiger Lake U (2020)
Release date17 July 2022 (2 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz2/2 GHz
L1 cacheno data160 KB
L2 cache1.5 MB2.5 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA1493BGA1499
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Celeron 6205. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 1.39 4.55
Recency 17 July 2022 1 September 2020
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron N6211 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 150% lower power consumption.

Celeron 6205, on the other hand, has 227.3% faster integrated GPU.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N6211 and Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Celeron 6205 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Celeron 6205, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211
Intel Celeron 6205
Celeron 6205

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 6205 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N6211 or Celeron 6205, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.