Atom x7835FE vs Celeron N6211
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2488 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.33 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Elkhart Lake | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Elkhart Lake (2022) | Amston Lake (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 17 July 2022 (3 years ago) | 1 October 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $54 | $150 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron N6211 and Atom x7835FE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N6211 and Atom x7835FE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1493 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1.5 MB | 12 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom x7835FE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom x7835FE are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom x7835FE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics 32EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom x7835FE.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 July 2022 | 1 October 2025 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 Watt | 12 Watt |
Celeron N6211 has 1100% lower power consumption.
Atom x7835FE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron N6211 and Intel Atom x7835FE. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Atom x7835FE is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
