Atom C3808 vs Celeron N6211

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N6211 and Atom C3808 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2218not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesElkhart LakeIntel Atom
Power efficiency20.50no data
Architecture codenameElkhart Lake (2022)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date17 July 2022 (2 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54$369

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and Atom C3808 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2 GHz
Multiplierno data22
L1 cacheno data672 KB
L2 cache1.5 MB12 MB
L3 cacheno data12 MB
Chip lithography10 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature70 °C86 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and Atom C3808 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA1493FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom C3808. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

Celeron N6211 and Atom C3808 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom C3808 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom C3808. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4: 2133
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom C3808.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 July 2022 15 August 2017
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron N6211 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

Atom C3808, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N6211 and Atom C3808. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Atom C3808 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Atom C3808, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211
Intel Atom C3808
Atom C3808

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N6211 or Atom C3808, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.