Atom C3808 vs Celeron N6211
Aggregate performance score
Atom C3808 outperforms Celeron N6211 by a whopping 153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N6211 and Atom C3808 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2238 | 1544 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.33 | 0.98 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Elkhart Lake | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 20.53 | 13.49 |
| Architecture codename | Elkhart Lake (2022) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| Release date | 17 July 2022 (2 years ago) | 15 August 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $54 | $369 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Celeron N6211 has 240% better value for money than Atom C3808.
Detailed specifications
Celeron N6211 and Atom C3808 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 22 |
| L1 cache | no data | 672 KB |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 12 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | 86 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N6211 and Atom C3808 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | BGA1493 | FCBGA1310 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6.5 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom C3808. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron N6211 and Atom C3808 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom C3808 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom C3808. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4: 2133 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 34.134 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom C3808.
| PCIe version | no data | 3 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
| USB revision | no data | 3 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 16 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 16 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | 4x10/2.5/1 GBE |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.40 | 3.54 |
| Recency | 17 July 2022 | 15 August 2017 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 25 Watt |
Celeron N6211 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.
Atom C3808, on the other hand, has a 152.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
The Atom C3808 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.
Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Atom C3808 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Atom C3808, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
