Athlon MP 2600+ vs Celeron N6211

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N6211 and Athlon MP 2600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2166not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesElkhart LakeAMD Athlon MP
Architecture codenameElkhart Lake (2022)Barton (2001−2004)
Release date17 July 2022 (2 years ago)6 May 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54$273

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and Athlon MP 2600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data266 MT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache1.5 MB512 KB
Chip lithography10 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data101 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data63 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and Athlon MP 2600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketBGA1493A
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt47 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Athlon MP 2600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Athlon MP 2600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 July 2022 6 May 2003
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 10 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 47 Watt

Celeron N6211 has an age advantage of 19 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 683.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N6211 and Athlon MP 2600+. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Athlon MP 2600+ is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Athlon MP 2600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211
AMD Athlon MP 2600+
Athlon MP 2600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Athlon MP 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N6211 or Athlon MP 2600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.