A4-5050 vs Celeron N6211

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N6211 and A4-5050 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2198	2575
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.33	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	Elkhart Lake	AMD A-Series
Power efficiency	20.53	5.30
Architecture codename	Elkhart Lake (2022)	Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date	17 July 2022 (2 years ago)	1 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$54	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and A4-5050 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	2	4
Base clock speed	1.2 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	3 GHz	1.5 GHz
L1 cache	no data	128K (per core)
L2 cache	1.5 MB	512K (per core)
L3 cache	no data	0 KB
Chip lithography	10 nm	32 nm
Die size	no data	246 mm2
Maximum core temperature	70 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	90 °C
Number of transistors	no data	1,178 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and A4-5050 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	BGA1493	FT3
Power consumption (TDP)	6.5 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and A4-5050. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and A4-5050 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

-

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and A4-5050. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR4

DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

AMD Radeon HD 8330

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.41	0.84
Integrated graphics card	1.39	0.69
Recency	17 July 2022	1 February 2014
Physical cores	2	4
Threads	2	4
Chip lithography	10 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	6 Watt	15 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and A4-5050, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---