Xeon W-1350 vs Celeron N5105

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron N5105
2021
4 cores / 4 threads
2.62
Xeon W-1350
2021
6 cores / 12 threads
12.29
+369%

Xeon W-1350 outperforms Celeron N5105 by 369% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Celeron N5105 and Xeon W-1350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1614562
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.9225.02
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)no data
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)1 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$1644 $690

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-1350 has 2620% better value for money than Celeron N5105.

Detailed Specifications

Celeron N5105 and Xeon W-1350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz5 GHz
L2 cache1.5 MBno data
L3 cache4 MB12 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography10 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N5105 and Xeon W-1350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1338FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5105 and Xeon W-1350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron N5105 and Xeon W-1350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection++
SGX--
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5105 and Xeon W-1350 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5105 and Xeon W-1350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data50 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics P750
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency800 MHz1.3 GHz
Execution Units2432
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5105 and Xeon W-1350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5105 and Xeon W-1350 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hz5120 x 3200 @60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hz5120 x 3200 @60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N5105 and Xeon W-1350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5105 and Xeon W-1350.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanes820
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N5105 2.62
Xeon W-1350 12.29
+369%

Xeon W-1350 outperforms Celeron N5105 by 369% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N5105 4059
Xeon W-1350 19015
+368%

Xeon W-1350 outperforms Celeron N5105 by 368% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N5105 470
Xeon W-1350 2185
+365%

Xeon W-1350 outperforms Celeron N5105 by 365% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N5105 1282
Xeon W-1350 8233
+542%

Xeon W-1350 outperforms Celeron N5105 by 542% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 2.62 12.29
Recency 11 January 2021 1 April 2021
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 80 Watt

The Xeon W-1350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5105 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N5105 is a desktop processor while Xeon W-1350 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5105 and Xeon W-1350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N5105
Celeron N5105
Intel Xeon W-1350
Xeon W-1350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 593 votes

Rate Celeron N5105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 20 votes

Rate Xeon W-1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N5105 or Xeon W-1350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.