EPYC 9654 vs Celeron N5105

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron N5105
2021
4 cores / 4 threads
2.65
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
79.71
+2908%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Celeron N5105 by 2908% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Celeron N5105 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16064
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.9611.92
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Genoa
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years old)10 November 2022 (1 year old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805
Current price$1644 $3975 (0.3x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9654 has 1142% better value for money than Celeron N5105.

Technical specs

Celeron N5105 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)96
Threads4192
Base clock speed2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N5105 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1338SP5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5105 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Celeron N5105 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5105 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5105 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size16 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphicsno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Graphics max frequency800 MHzno data
Execution Units24no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5105 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5105 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N5105 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5105 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanes8128
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N5105 2.65
EPYC 9654 79.71
+2908%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Celeron N5105 by 2908% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N5105 4059
EPYC 9654 122091
+2908%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Celeron N5105 by 2908% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N5105 469
EPYC 9654 1829
+290%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Celeron N5105 by 290% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N5105 1280
EPYC 9654 18566
+1350%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Celeron N5105 by 1350% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.65 79.71
Recency 11 January 2021 10 November 2022
Physical cores 4 96
Threads 4 192
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5105 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N5105 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5105 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N5105
Celeron N5105
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 578 votes

Rate Intel Celeron N5105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 978 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N5105 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.