Ultra 7 265H vs Celeron N5100
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 7 265H outperforms Celeron N5100 by a whopping 856% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2008 | 329 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 32.55 | 66.67 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Jasper Lake (2021) | Arrow Lake-H (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 11 January 2021 (4 years ago) | 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $471 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N5100 and Core Ultra 7 265H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 6 |
| Efficient-cores | no data | 8 |
| Low Power Efficient-cores | no data | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 110 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N5100 and Core Ultra 7 265H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1338 | FCBGA2049 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5100 and Core Ultra 7 265H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
| Smart Response | - | no data |
| GPIO | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | - | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN |
Security technologies
Celeron N5100 and Core Ultra 7 265H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| SGX | - | no data |
| OS Guard | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5100 and Core Ultra 7 265H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5100 and Core Ultra 7 265H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5-6400 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics | Intel® Arc™ 140T GPU |
| Quick Sync Video | + | + |
| Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Execution Units | 24 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5100 and Core Ultra 7 265H integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 4 |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5100 and Core Ultra 7 265H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | no data |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@60Hz | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL) |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2160@60Hz | 3840x2400 @ 120Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2160@60Hz | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron N5100 and Core Ultra 7 265H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5100 and Core Ultra 7 265H.
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 28 |
| PCI support | no data | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| USB revision | 2.0/3.2 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 14 | no data |
| Integrated LAN | - | no data |
| UART | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.04 | 19.50 |
| Recency | 11 January 2021 | 1 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 28 Watt |
Celeron N5100 has 366.7% lower power consumption.
Ultra 7 265H, on the other hand, has a 855.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron N5100 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
