Ultra 7 265HX vs Celeron N5095A
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N5095A and Core Ultra 7 265HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1767 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 16.33 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Jasper Lake (2021) | no data |
| Release date | 1 July 2021 (3 years ago) | 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N5095A and Core Ultra 7 265HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 8 |
| Efficient-cores | no data | 12 |
| Threads | 4 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 30 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N5095A and Core Ultra 7 265HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | BGA1338 | FCBGA2114 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5095A and Core Ultra 7 265HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| vPro | - | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
| Smart Response | - | no data |
| GPIO | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | - | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN |
Security technologies
Celeron N5095A and Core Ultra 7 265HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| SGX | - | no data |
| OS Guard | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5095A and Core Ultra 7 265HX are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5095A and Core Ultra 7 265HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5-6400 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 192 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics | Intel® Graphics |
| Quick Sync Video | + | + |
| Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Execution Units | 16 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5095A and Core Ultra 7 265HX integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 4 |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5095A and Core Ultra 7 265HX integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | no data |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@60Hz | 4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL) |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2160@60Hz | 3840x2400 @ 120Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2160@60Hz | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron N5095A and Core Ultra 7 265HX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5095A and Core Ultra 7 265HX.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 24 |
| USB revision | 2.0/3.2 | no data |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 14 | no data |
| Integrated LAN | - | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2021 | 1 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 20 |
| Threads | 4 | 20 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
Celeron N5095A has 266.7% lower power consumption.
Ultra 7 265HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N5095A and Core Ultra 7 265HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron N5095A is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 265HX is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5095A and Core Ultra 7 265HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
