Xeon W-11955M vs Celeron N5095

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N5095
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.67
Xeon W-11955M
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.76
+453%

Xeon W-11955M outperforms Celeron N5095 by a whopping 453% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N5095 and Xeon W-11955M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1725504
Place by popularity30not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.56
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency16.2338.45
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Tiger Lake-H (2021)
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$623

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N5095 and Xeon W-11955M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz5 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm SuperFin
Die sizeno data190 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N5095 and Xeon W-11955M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1338FCBGA1787
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5095 and Xeon W-11955M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
vPro-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N5095 and Xeon W-11955M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
SGX--
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5095 and Xeon W-11955M are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5095 and Xeon W-11955M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.2 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD GraphicsIntel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency750 MHz1.45 GHz
Execution Units1632

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5095 and Xeon W-11955M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5095 and Xeon W-11955M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hz7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N5095 and Xeon W-11955M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5095 and Xeon W-11955M.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanes820
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N5095 2.67
Xeon W-11955M 14.76
+453%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N5095 4080
Xeon W-11955M 22596
+454%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N5095 364
Xeon W-11955M 1846
+407%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N5095 106
Xeon W-11955M 230
+117%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Celeron N5095 2.5
Xeon W-11955M 8.6
+244%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Celeron N5095 1706
Xeon W-11955M 8815
+417%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron N5095 2028
Xeon W-11955M 9058
+347%

Blender(-)

Celeron N5095 1547
+461%
Xeon W-11955M 276

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron N5095 651
Xeon W-11955M 1587
+144%

7-Zip Single

Celeron N5095 3100
Xeon W-11955M 5222
+68.5%

7-Zip

Celeron N5095 11013
Xeon W-11955M 47264
+329%

WebXPRT 3

Celeron N5095 125
Xeon W-11955M 271
+116%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.67 14.76
Recency 11 January 2021 11 May 2021
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron N5095 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-11955M, on the other hand, has a 452.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Xeon W-11955M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5095 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron N5095 is a desktop processor while Xeon W-11955M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5095 and Xeon W-11955M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095
Intel Xeon W-11955M
Xeon W-11955M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1438 votes

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 23 votes

Rate Xeon W-11955M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N5095 or Xeon W-11955M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.