PRO A10-8770E vs Celeron N5095

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N5095
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.57
+34.6%
PRO A10-8770E
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.91

Celeron N5095 outperforms PRO A10-8770E by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N5095 and PRO A10-8770E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17441973
Place by popularity39not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Jasper Lakeno data
Power efficiency16.225.17
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)October 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N5095 and PRO A10-8770E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.5 GHz
L2 cache1.5 MB2048 KB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography10 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data250 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N5095 and PRO A10-8770E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1338AM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5095 and PRO A10-8770E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N5095 and PRO A10-8770E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5095 and PRO A10-8770E are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5095 and PRO A10-8770E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD GraphicsAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Quick Sync Video+-
Switchable graphics-+
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5095 and PRO A10-8770E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+n/a
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5095 and PRO A10-8770E integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N5095 and PRO A10-8770E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12DirectX® 12
OpenGL4.5no data
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5095 and PRO A10-8770E.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanes8no data
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N5095 2.57
+34.6%
PRO A10-8770E 1.91

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N5095 4078
+34.3%
PRO A10-8770E 3036

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.57 1.91
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron N5095 has a 34.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N5095 is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A10-8770E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5095 and PRO A10-8770E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095
AMD PRO A10-8770E
PRO A10-8770E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1460 votes

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 34 votes

Rate PRO A10-8770E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N5095 or PRO A10-8770E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.