EPYC 9965 vs Celeron N5095

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N5095 and EPYC 9965 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1733not rated
Place by popularity30not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Jasper Lakeno data
Power efficiency16.21no data
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Turin (2024)
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$14,813

Detailed specifications

Celeron N5095 and EPYC 9965 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)192
Threads4384
Base clock speed2 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N5095 and EPYC 9965 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1338SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5095 and EPYC 9965. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron N5095 and EPYC 9965 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5095 and EPYC 9965 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5095 and EPYC 9965. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD GraphicsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5095 and EPYC 9965 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5095 and EPYC 9965 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N5095 and EPYC 9965 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5095 and EPYC 9965.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanes8128
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2021 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 192
Threads 4 384
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 500 Watt

Celeron N5095 has 3233.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9965, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N5095 and EPYC 9965. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron N5095 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9965 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5095 and EPYC 9965, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095
AMD EPYC 9965
EPYC 9965

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1444 votes

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 9965 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N5095 or EPYC 9965, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.