Ultra 9 285K vs Celeron N5095

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N5095
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.57
Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
43.04
+1575%

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms Celeron N5095 by a whopping 1575% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N5095 and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking174454
Place by popularity39not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data74.27
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Jasper Lakeno data
Power efficiency16.2032.56
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N5095 and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus rateno data250 MHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N5095 and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1338FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5095 and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vPro-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-+
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Celeron N5095 and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5095 and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5095 and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size16 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD GraphicsIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency750 MHz2 GHz
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5095 and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5095 and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hz4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hz4K @ 60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hz8K @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N5095 and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5095 and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes820
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N5095 2.57
Ultra 9 285K 43.04
+1575%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N5095 4076
Ultra 9 285K 68370
+1577%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron N5095 2028
Ultra 9 285K 25963
+1180%

Blender(-)

Celeron N5095 1547
+1858%
Ultra 9 285K 79

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron N5095 651
Ultra 9 285K 2388
+267%

7-Zip Single

Celeron N5095 3100
Ultra 9 285K 7366
+138%

7-Zip

Celeron N5095 11013
Ultra 9 285K 129706
+1078%

WebXPRT 3

Celeron N5095 125
Ultra 9 285K 387
+209%

CrossMark Overall

Celeron N5095 490
Ultra 9 285K 2531
+417%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Celeron N5095 95
Ultra 9 285K 350
+268%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Celeron N5095 2936
+2277%
Ultra 9 285K 124

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.57 43.04
Recency 11 January 2021 24 October 2024
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron N5095 has 733.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has a 1574.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5095 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5095 and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1463 votes

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 167 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N5095 or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.