A6-9200 SoC vs Celeron N5095
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N5095 and A6-9200 SoC processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1747 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 51 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Jasper Lake | no data |
| Power efficiency | 16.16 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Jasper Lake (2021) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 11 January 2021 (3 years ago) | 31 May 2016 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N5095 and A6-9200 SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | no data | 125 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N5095 and A6-9200 SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1338 | FT4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5095 and A6-9200 SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | - | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Smart Response | - | no data |
| GPIO | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron N5095 and A6-9200 SoC technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| SGX | - | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5095 and A6-9200 SoC are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5095 and A6-9200 SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics | Radeon R4 2CU |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | no data |
| Execution Units | 16 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5095 and A6-9200 SoC integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5095 and A6-9200 SoC integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | no data |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron N5095 and A6-9200 SoC integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5095 and A6-9200 SoC.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 8 |
| USB revision | 2.0/3.2 | no data |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 14 | no data |
| Integrated LAN | - | no data |
| UART | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 January 2021 | 31 May 2016 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
Celeron N5095 has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
A6-9200 SoC, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N5095 and A6-9200 SoC. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron N5095 is a desktop processor while A6-9200 SoC is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5095 and A6-9200 SoC, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
