Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U vs Celeron N4500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4500
2021
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.28
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
12.42
+870%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Celeron N4500 by a whopping 870% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2197578
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Barcelo-U Refresh
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data180 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1338FP6
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Celeron N4500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD GraphicsAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Quick Sync Video+no data
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanes816
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4500 1.28
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 12.42
+870%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Celeron N4500 by 870% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N4500 1976
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 19213
+872%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Celeron N4500 by 872% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N4500 440
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 1588
+261%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Celeron N4500 by 261% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N4500 711
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 5800
+716%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Celeron N4500 by 716% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron N4500 2053
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 8758
+327%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Celeron N4500 by 327% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Celeron N4500 50.2
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 10.43
+381%

Celeron N4500 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U by 381% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Celeron N4500 2
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 18
+736%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Celeron N4500 by 736% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron N4500 171
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 1756
+927%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Celeron N4500 by 927% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron N4500 82
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 229
+179%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Celeron N4500 by 179% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Celeron N4500 1.04
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 2.68
+158%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Celeron N4500 by 158% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N4500 1.1
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 4.2
+282%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Celeron N4500 by 282% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N4500 1076
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 5274
+390%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Celeron N4500 by 390% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N4500 12
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 95
+690%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Celeron N4500 by 690% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N4500 61
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U 221
+265%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U outperforms Celeron N4500 by 265% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.28 12.42
Recency 11 January 2021 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4500
Celeron N4500
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 609 votes

Rate Celeron N4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4500 or Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.