Xeon E5450 vs Celeron N4100
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5450 outperforms Celeron N4100 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2373 | 2333 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.48 | 0.03 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 9.86 | 0.78 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Goldmont Plus (2017) | Harpertown (2007−2008) |
| Release date | 11 December 2017 (7 years ago) | 11 November 2007 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $915 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Celeron N4100 has 1500% better value for money than Xeon E5450.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron N4100 and Xeon E5450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Multiplier | 11 | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 6 MB (per die) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 12 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 deg C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 63 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 820 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.35V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N4100 and Xeon E5450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 |
| Socket | FCBGA1090 | LGA771 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4100 and Xeon E5450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Smart Response | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| GPIO | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron N4100 and Xeon E5450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| MPX | + | - |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4100 and Xeon E5450 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4100 and Xeon E5450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | N/A |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 700 MHz | no data |
| Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4100 and Xeon E5450 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4100 and Xeon E5450 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron N4100 and Xeon E5450 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4100 and Xeon E5450.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | no data |
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 8 | no data |
| Integrated LAN | - | no data |
| UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.40 | 1.47 |
| Recency | 11 December 2017 | 11 November 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 80 Watt |
Celeron N4100 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon E5450, on the other hand, has a 5% higher aggregate performance score.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Celeron N4100 and Intel Xeon E5450.
Be aware that Celeron N4100 is a notebook processor while Xeon E5450 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
