Celeron G6900E vs N4100
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N4100 and Celeron G6900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2119 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
Power efficiency | 24.45 | no data |
Architecture codename | Goldmont Plus (2017) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
Release date | 11 December 2017 (6 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N4100 and Celeron G6900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
Multiplier | 11 | no data |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105 deg C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N4100 and Celeron G6900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1090 | 1700 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 46 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4100 and Celeron G6900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Smart Response | - | no data |
GPIO | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron N4100 and Celeron G6900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
MPX | + | - |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4100 and Celeron G6900E are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4100 and Celeron G6900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 700 MHz | no data |
Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4100 and Celeron G6900E integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4100 and Celeron G6900E integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron N4100 and Celeron G6900E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4100 and Celeron G6900E.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 6 | no data |
USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 8 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 0.87 | 2.85 |
Recency | 11 December 2017 | 4 January 2022 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 46 Watt |
Celeron N4100 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 666.7% lower power consumption.
Celeron G6900E, on the other hand, has 227.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N4100 and Celeron G6900E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron N4100 is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900E is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4100 and Celeron G6900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.